From the Rabbi's Study




Internet Chaburah


Prologue:        The book of Bamidbar seems to be the first whose theme is somewhat unclear. The uniting theme of  Berashis spells out the growth of Adam until Mitzrayim and serves as a guide for future generations (Maaseh Avot Siman L"Banim). Shemos describes the birth of one nation, under God. VaYikra is Torat Kohanim and more wholly is the book of Kedusha of man, of place and of time. But what unites Bamidbar?


Abarbanel in his commentary, notes that Bamidbar is the book of national conduct. The Torah sets ground rules for camping and counting the nation and details challenges to unity. Even the Mitzvot of Bamidbar are exclusively applied to those effecting the future generations alone. 

Ramban offers a slightly different understanding. He sees the book of Bamidbar as being one that completes the topics not completed in the book of Shemos or VaYikra. He even adds that the Mitzvot in this book are exclusively limited to those that are L'shaah. Ramban goes to great detail to explain the Mitzvot of the book as limited to the needs of the nation at the time. Each explanation still returns to a central theme - the need of the nation (See Bamidbar 5:6, 15:18 and Sforno to 15:18 for examples).


Clearly whatever approach you adopt, the lesson of BaMidbar abound. Whenever and wherever, united we stand, divided we fall. And where there is no God there is no unity.

This week's Chaburah examines one of the most important lessons of unity in community and details the difference of L'Shaah or L"Dorot. It is entitled:



Touching the Wall: Kotel Konnections



        Chazal tell us that the Shechina never left the Western wall of the Beis HaMikdash (Shemos Rabba 2:2). The Midrash clarifies that the reason Hashem can never destroy the Western wall because it is the place of the Shechina (Eicha Rabbasi 1:32). The Radvaz (Shut Radvaz II:648) explains that this does not mean that true Kedusha remains only at the Kotel, rather the Makom Kodesh HaKodoshim remains Kadosh even after destruction.  The addition is that the Makom Mikdash is most potent in the West. However, one davening on Har HaBayis (when he has no choice to be there) does not face the Kotel during Tefilla. He faces Makom HaKodesh HaKodoshim. 

        In fact, there has been a long standing tradition in Judaism, stretching back to the times of Yaakov Aveinu, to pour our hearts out at the Kotel (Pirkei D'r'eliezer 35:Rashi <Berashis 28:19>). The Gemara (Berachos 31a) suggests that the sanctity of the place adds to the Hislahavus of the one who davens there. But can one benefit from the Kotel? May one kiss the wall or take part of the stones home?

        The Radvaz (II:691) notes that in his opinion, the wall of the Kotel is, in fact a wall of the actual inner sanctum (Azara) of the Beis HaMikdash. Given his position that the Dome of the Rock is the Makom Kodesh HaKodoshim, it would follow that the Kotel of today is the wall of the Azara and therefore, a Baal Keri and a Nidda (even a girl prior to her wedding) may not approach the Kotel (See Chochmas Adam, Mishpitei HaAretz, 8). According to this position, not only does one not have permission to touch the Kotel, many might not even be able to approach the Kotel. Beis Radvaz (38) and Shut Har Zvi (Yoreh Deah p. 269) try to explain Minhag Yisrael despite the position of the Radvaz.

        However, it has been noted that the wall of the Kotel is not really the wall of the Azara. The Avnei Nezer (Yoreh Deah, 450) clearly notes that the Kotel must be the wall of Har HaBayis and not the Azara. Rav Yechiel Michel Tuckechinski (Sefer Eretz Yisrael) notes that in the days of the Kaftor V"ferach, the Kotel was not even able to be seen. Accordingly, he feels that it is clear that the Kotel is not inside the Har HaBayis but outside it. If it had been part of Har HaBayis, it would have never been covered (it would have been on top of the mountain). There are those who are still Machmir not to visit the Kotel for this reason (See HaMiasef, III:121). The Griz was included among them (See Iggros Moshe, Orach Chaim II:113). 

        A question was put forth to Maharil Diskin as to whether people may put notes into the Kotel wall. The Maharil Diskin (Sefer Mishkenos L"Avir Yaakov) reportedly did not feel that he needed to deal with the question given that the Kotel did not have Kedushat HaMikdash according to him. The Aderet too, felt that one may put his fingers against the wall of the Kotel for it is not Kadosh. However, if it is not Kadosh, why do somany choose to specify the beauty of Davening there?

        Rav Yitzchak Yosef (Yalkut Yosef Dinei Har HaBayis) cites a Taz who feels that the Kedusha of the Kotel is that of being the largest Shul (Siman 151). Thus, even if we adopt the prevalent assumption that the Kotel is not the wall of the Azara, it is an especially significant Makom Kadosh.  The only Chiddush is that according to the view of the Taz, one might recognize a Kedusha of the Kotel without seeing the area as Meila (see Har Zvi Yoreh Deah, p. 281). 

        So how far does Kedushat HaKotel extend today? Rav Moshe (Iggros Moshe, Y.D. IV:63)  felt that although we do not see the area of the wall as Kotel Azara, there is still Meila if one takes part of the stones. This is based upon the idea that the Kedusha of Kotel Har HaBayis was never removed from the original wall. The Tzitz Eliezer (x:1) and Rav Ovadiah (cited in Yalkut Yosef vol. II) agree. Still, the prevailing opinion permits one to place Kvitlach into the wall as the outside and the spaces in the stones were not Mikudash (see Avnei Nezer above). In cases of great need, Rav Ovadiah allows the bushes in the Kotel to be trimmed. All agree that the Kedusha of the Kotel is clear and needs to be respected.

Shabbat Shalom